Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: replace old 23.11 channel URLs after first 24.05 release is out #1063

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: fc-24.05-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

osnyx
Copy link
Member

@osnyx osnyx commented Jul 12, 2024

also updates the pinned tarball for building the docs

@flyingcircusio/release-managers

Release process

Impact: -

Changelog: -

PR release workflow (internal)

  • PR has internal ticket
  • internal issue ID (PL-…) part of branch name
  • internal issue ID mentioned in PR description text
  • ticket is on Platform agile board
  • ticket state set to Pull request ready
  • if ticket is more urgent than within the next few days, directly contact a member of the Platform team

Design notes

  • Provide a feature toggle if the change might need to be adjusted/reverted quickly depending on context. Consider whether the default should be on or off. Example: rate limiting.
  • All customer-facing features and (NixOS) options need to be discoverable from documentation. Add or update relevant documentation such that hosted and guided customers can understand it as well.

Security implications

  • Security requirements defined? (WHERE)
    • keep software used for docs and recommended by docs up-to-date
    • documentation still needs to render correctly
  • Security requirements tested? (EVIDENCE)
    • updated channel url to a 24.05 release
    • looked at rendered docs

also updates the pinned tarball for building the docs
host = dev.example.com

channel = https://hydra.flyingcircus.io/build/116563/download/1/nixexprs.tar.xz
channel = https://hydra.flyingcircus.io/build/457353/download/1/nixexprs.tar.xz
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not fully certain about this here: What is the role of the channel specification now that we already have a release = fcrs://fc-24.05-production/2024_021 that points to metadate holding the same channel information?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant